Yeah, it's another "what to expect" post. Well, kind of. I guess it's more of a "this is what I'd not only like to see, but what I think is at least semi-likely considering what's happened since his last album"... post. About Eminem.
As you may have heard, Eazy's (get it? like Weezy but Eazy cuz his name starts with an E? do you love me yet?) back in the lab, and his latest experiment's called... The Marshall Mathers LP 2. A sequel to an early album. Hmm. Not automatically a bad thing, but imagine for a second, if you will, another artist saying their next album's gonna be a sequel to a hyper-acclaimed first-ish album of theirs. The Joshua Tree (U)2. Blood Sugar Sex Magik Returns. Highway 61 Visited For A Third Time. Son of the College Dropout (actually...).
First reactions? None of these would sound like awful ideas, but they're not really necessary and it feels like they're kind of grasping at straws, or at least taking a jump backwards after all these years of growth. That's how part of me feels about The Marshall Mathers LP 2. However, the rest of me has very high hopes. Em's already proved a few times that he's no slouch when it comes to concepts spanning multiple albums, no matter how tight or loose
they may be. The Eminem Show and Encore. Relapse and Recovery. So what if he's a few years late on this one? I'm sure he'll whip something up that's at least on par with the past few years.
That being said, these are a few hopeful "predictions" or educated guesses as to what we could see on the TMMLP2, based on what Eminem's been trending towards, what it feels like he's trying to recapture, what's happened in the world of popular culture these days.
Collaboration with a younger up-and-comer (and by young I mean like, close-to-my-age young). My vote goes for Childish Gambino cuz he's a personal favorite, but somehow I don't think that's happening. I really have no idea what they think of each other. More likely, I'm leaning towards Hopsin or Danny Brown.
A song rife with Breaking Bad references, or at least with an accompanying video that lampoons it. I just hope he's playing both parts (meaning Walter and Jesse... maybe Gus too... and Skyler... and Walter Junior... yeah, I think I'd enjoy that). I don't think it's too far of a stretch. Em's very up on popular culture (as any artist should be, IMO), and I'd think he's no stranger to as big a phenomenon as Breaking Bad. Not to say I think he should jump on the bandwagon and start publicly advocating for the show for the hell of it. Nothing against the show or its fanbase, but I feel like that would come across as kinda weird and forced, and very un-Eminem. I just think there's a lot of connections to be drawn between his persona/phrases/aesthetic and the show, enough to make a song out of.
A sequel to Stan? I'm talking more "spiritual sequel" here, like Love The Way You Lie Part 2 - doesn't continue the exact same narrative per se, but it's a further exploration of the pairing of those themes with that aesthetic. Unless... a song about Stan's little brother having grown up over these past 13 years, fostering a burning hatred for the negligent star that (from his perspective) drove his brother to murder-suicide, now ready to take revenge? Think about it.
Riffage and grooves worthy of the Mike Elizondo days. We miss you, Mike (yeah, he was on like 4 tracks from Relapse, but he hasn't exactly been a series regular in years). Don't get me wrong, I love everything Eminem's ever done (musically). But his more recent albums seem a bit... I dunno, busy? On a similar note...
Re-exploration of the pop-rap sensibility we saw on Recovery. Maybe take a few tricks from that and apply it to the old grit and snarl of first-few-albums Eminem. I know, pop-rap (a la Kanye, Gambino) and good old Midwestern horrorcore doesn't sound like the most homogeneous of mixtures, but sleek and aggressive go together better than you might think. Black Skinhead, anyone?
M0ar juicy genre-bending. Eminem's no stranger to including a variety of sounds in his albums, but he's generally hovered in the realm of popular music these days (hip-hop tropes, some pop here, some hard rock there, sometimes a garage aesthetic like in Won't Back Down or his latest, Berzerk). Let's go batshit with this one. He's already going for broke by making a sequel to an album almost 15 years later - why not go ass-crazy with it? Not to say he should up and make this the bastard child of a David Bowie and Brian Eno record. But hey, with the right balance of the familiar and the alien, this album could do for modern rap what Sandinista! did for punk, what Nevermind did for alternative. Sure, rap's had several contenders for an album like that since Y2K - but nothing quite there, I'd argue. Something minimalist and almost resembling spoken word. A self-lampooning dance beat. A collab with a metal guitarist. Rapping in 6/8 over something Mumfordy. There's endless possibilities in hip-hop, and I think Eminem's got the dynamite to blow that gold mine wide open.
And lastly...
A collaboration with Marilyn Manson that isn't a remix. Okay, this isn't actually going to happen. Ever. But I said a-god-damn momma, I can dream.
Well, I think six predictions and a fantasy's enough for one day. 'Til next time!
Showing posts with label kanye west. Show all posts
Showing posts with label kanye west. Show all posts
Thursday, August 29, 2013
The Shady Lab Dre Mathers Eminem Recovery's Back Back Again LP 15
Labels:
black skinhead,
blood sugar sex magik,
breaking bad,
brian eno,
childish gambino,
danny brown,
david bowie,
eminem,
highway 61 revisited,
hopsin,
joshua tree,
kanye west,
marilyn manson,
marshall mathers lp 2,
mike elizondo,
mumford,
relapse,
stan,
the college dropout
Monday, August 26, 2013
Post About the VMAs (a.k.a. I Have No Pride)
'Bout that time again! Yes, that time where I chain myself to a keyboard for a couple hours, subject you to a page or so of self-loathing and uninformed observations, all in the name of telling myself I'm a productive person.
...Hm. Bummer note, eh? Here's an absurdly happy dog.
I've been hearing a lot about these VMAs. Like... Vehicle for Mediocre Antics or something, right?
Okay, so "ironic" humor's not my thing. Yes, I know what the stupid freaking VMAs are. I don't pay attention to them. I pay them less attention than I do the Grammys. That's not because I hate America or Miley Cyrus or "the mainstream" or just watching celebrities for a few hours. It's fun, entertaining, mostly harmless. Watching and enjoying shows like these isn't something to be criticized.
I just don't watch them because, well... what's a more intelligent way of saying "I don't wanna"?
There's some entertaining bits between awards. Some of the winners deserve it, some of them don't. There's flubs, gaffs, the magical antics of Kanye West, we get the drill. For a schlub like me, the bulk of the entertainment comes from the ensuing social media outflow. It's like hitting the drains after one great big honking mother of a storm; all kinds of crap washes out there, and some of it's actually pretty great.
For this week's post (or... one of them; maybe one of these days I'll actually get back to writing more than once a day), I've painstakingly collated data from various public channels into a set of uh... Oh fer Christ, this is based entirely off my Facebook feed, okay? It's a damn humor blog, kind of. If you don't like it, there's the New Yorker.
...Hm. Bummer note, eh? Here's an absurdly happy dog.
I've been hearing a lot about these VMAs. Like... Vehicle for Mediocre Antics or something, right?
Okay, so "ironic" humor's not my thing. Yes, I know what the stupid freaking VMAs are. I don't pay attention to them. I pay them less attention than I do the Grammys. That's not because I hate America or Miley Cyrus or "the mainstream" or just watching celebrities for a few hours. It's fun, entertaining, mostly harmless. Watching and enjoying shows like these isn't something to be criticized.
I just don't watch them because, well... what's a more intelligent way of saying "I don't wanna"?
There's some entertaining bits between awards. Some of the winners deserve it, some of them don't. There's flubs, gaffs, the magical antics of Kanye West, we get the drill. For a schlub like me, the bulk of the entertainment comes from the ensuing social media outflow. It's like hitting the drains after one great big honking mother of a storm; all kinds of crap washes out there, and some of it's actually pretty great.
For this week's post (or... one of them; maybe one of these days I'll actually get back to writing more than once a day), I've painstakingly collated data from various public channels into a set of uh... Oh fer Christ, this is based entirely off my Facebook feed, okay? It's a damn humor blog, kind of. If you don't like it, there's the New Yorker.
5 Things To Expect From the Next VMAs
1. Lady Gaga will wear a dress made of live parrots.
I know, overdone. But I'd really like to see this. Was there even a thing about Lady Gaga at the Veemas this year? Or was she out-crazied?
Assuming it still counts as crazy if it's totally pre-planned and inauthentic.
2. Someone else will try to pull an "I'ma let you finish" and promptly get popped in the face.
Then again, I don't think there's a lot of other Kanyes-in-waiting out there with the right balance of ego and batshittery (and a dash of cajones) that would try such a thing. It would also have to be someone clinging to the final threads of relevancy, someone with so little pride they have to pull a horrible stunt that's somehow even worse for being done before.
Your time to shine, Billie.
3. I'll make another one of these stupid posts.
Cuz I'm really having trouble coming up with five things for this damnable post.
4. A barbershop quartet bit with Chris Brown, Kobe Bryant, Lil' Wayne, and Toby Keith.
Because if there's anything the VMAs love, it's hating women.
5. New category: The Video That Could Be Most Improved By Cameos From The Cast Of Jersey Shore
I don't actually know if the VMAs have categories. That's how little I know about what I'm writing about. But god damn it you know this should be a thing. In the VMAs. But like only the VMAs. Please.
...
Well, that's enough phoning it in for one day. Tune in next time for uh... something that isn't this.
Labels:
absurdly happy dog,
billie joe armstrong,
chris brown,
facebook,
fuck chris brown forreal doe,
grammys,
green day,
ima let you finish,
jersey shore,
kanye west,
katy perry,
kobe bryant,
lady gaga,
lil wayne,
miley cyrus,
rihanna,
taylor swift,
the new yorker,
toby keith,
vmas
Thursday, May 9, 2013
Interview with Joe Meno, Part 3
Welcome welcome, to the third and final portion of this fantabulous thing called an interview!
If you can't tell, I'm rather sick of introductions. Read the damn post.
Me: So, besides the ages, what did you feel really changed about the scene in Chicago from when you started playing to when you stopped?
Joe: In the mid-90s in Chicago, there was this emphasis more on art rock or math rock or post-rock bands, like The Sea and Cake, Tortoise, Don Caballero, bands that were pretty instrument-based, almost jazz-influenced. The idea of being "rock", like a rock band, whether that was garage rock or indie rock – for a couple years, that fell away. So at a lot of venues, there was like - I don’t wanna say prog-rock or whatever, but these people were awesome at their instruments - there were no lyrics, mostly instrumental music, bands that had more of an abstract sound… and that was real interesting for a while. And then in the late 90s, there was this revival or resurgence of garage rock that really took off. There was this great explosion of bands like Baseball Furies, and Brian [Costello’s] band the Functional Blackouts, and a couple bands that I played in. Then this real interesting scene started developing - and I think I still see them online - this magazine Horizontal Action, and there were all these different garage-rock-oriented festivals. Suddenly, there was the return of, “Okay, it’s cool again to be in a rock band, and have songs with lyrics, and to honor the music you had grown up listening to," like The Who, or The Rolling Stones, or The Beatles. And then in the late 90s, early 2000s, there was a kind of similar resurgence on a national level, bands like The Hives, and The Strokes, and The White Stripes, bands that were getting national attention that were returning to a more familiar rock-song structure and sound, and it echoed what was already going on here. It was wonderful, because that’s the music I always loved, you know? I like rock music. Not to say I’m not a huge jazz fan – it’s just a different kind of experience.
Me: It’s more familiar.
Joe: It is, and I mean, Chicago has one of the greatest avant-garde jazz scenes in the world, and we have these great people, like Ken Vandermark, and a number of other amazing soloists and avant-garde players, but going to see a jazz show, it’s kinda this thing up here [hovers his hands around his cranium] and it feels like you listen with your head, and not with your chest and your balls – like when you see a great rock show and your whole body’s involved.
Me: I’ve always heard the word “cerebral” to describe certain bands like that.
Joe: And it is! And it’s also clear that Vandermark grew up listening to Black Sabbath, and it feels like “Oh shit, this is as intense.” It still has those rock elements, even though it is avant-garde jazz.
Places like the Empty Bottle and Lounge Acts hosted these different nights to promote these different kinds of sound. And they still do! Well, the Hideout kinda took over when Lounge Acts closed. And then there was the “return to rock” thing. Somewhere in there too, there was this blossoming indie rock scene, which was a little more reserved or restrained. Bands that were echoing the Pixies, or Pavement, or the Smiths. There were bands like the Scotland Yard Gospel Choir and… I’m trying to think of who else fits that bill, that incorporated stuff from folk and rock, that had maybe a less direct garage-rock/punk sound, but still didn’t feel like mainstream rock. You could go see a show, and there was this loud punk-kinda garage band, here’s this band that feels more indie rock, here’s this other band that has some weird instrumentation. Venues like that showed the breath of all the different music that was being produced at that time. You feel really luck to be able to go see a show that has that many different kinds of music being played.
Me: When you were first starting out, back in the early 90s, what bands that you’d seen or played with did you look up to? Like, who made you want to play music?
Joe: There are a few bands here in Chicago, they were bands I felt were so tremendous that I didn’t associate them with Chicago, like “Oh man, I didn’t even know they were from here”, bands like the Jesus Lizard-
Me: Oh shit.
Joe: Well there you go! I saw a couple shows at the Metro, and they were just completely electrifying… They were bands like that, that made you think “This is why I live in Chicago, because people like that are making music.” You almost felt this weird sense of ownership. Bands like that, and the Mids – I think they broke up by ’95 or ’96. That was one of the big bands. And there were bands like Shellac, Steve Albini’s band, who’d put out these really formidable, really interesting records. Jay Ryan’s band, Dianogah, which was another more instrumental, but really really interesting band that starting putting on shows in the mid-90s, and I think every so often they continue to play. That was more noise rock or aggressive rock stuff. And then there were bands like Andrew Bird, who was doing this quasi-jazz rock folk stuff that had interesting instrumentation – like instead of there being a lead guitar set up, there’d be someone playing a violin. To this day, Andrew Bird is widely recognized, still lives in town. Then there's like, Jeff Tweedy of Wilco. Bands like that in the mid-90s that you felt were almost ambassadors. And that’s not even to mention by the mid-90s/late-90s, Chicago hip-hop started to take off, performers like Kanye West and Lupe Fiasco. Those guys suddenly put Chicago on the map in a huge way, so you felt like you’re part of this city that’s on the forefront of some really interesting music.
Me: I guess we’ll move on to the final question: the hackneyed interview question. If you had to tell your younger musician self something, what would it be?
Joe: I don’t know if I’ve ever heard that question. I don’t think it’s hackneyed at all!
Well, it’s like I said earlier, that playing in bands… There’s just all these interesting implications I wouldn't have been aware of at the time, like helping you understand your relationship to an audience, your idea of promotion, and marketing, and touring. Even when I’m writing a short story, I don’t feel like it’s done until I can read it to an audience, and that’s one of the ways I figure out if it’s working or not; you read it and you’re like “Ooh… This part… that didn't work,” or “This part, people laughed.”
When you’re in a band, you’re constantly doing stuff. You’re writing songs, you record a record, you have to make flyers, you have to rent a van or save up and buy one, maybe you play a bunch of shows, and you’re constantly having to convince your friends and strangers to come to your shows and promote yourself in a fairly aggressive way, right? If you book a show at a venue and no one shows up, they’re not gonna have you back. So this pursuit of making stuff and getting in the habit of finding a way to get it out in the world, whether it’s making a record or making a flyer, getting posters made, booking shows, that habit that I did over and over and over again in my twenties, it really helped me as a writer, cuz I still do that stuff, I still am having constantly to promote work.
I had two books come out with these big corporate presses, my first two novels, and they had a certain way of promoting their books, which meant they just kinda sent them out to reviewers and hoped people reviewed them – and I had grown up playing in all these bands, and I was like “Why not go on tour? I could do it for cheap, I could sleep on strangers’ floors – I’ll sell books out of the car.” and they’d never had someone do that. This was what I’d been doing. Third book came out. I worked with a publisher that was really interested in that idea, and the book was a huge success because I was able to get out and tour, basically adapt what I’d been doing, what I knew already worked. If I do a reading in Portland, I need to get like, two people from Portland on the bill, cuz if I show up and I only know ten people in Portland, there’s only gonna be ten people in the bookstore. But if I invite another writer, or some musician, then we’ll have forty people. That was a totally foreign concept to a lot of these publicists, and they were actually afraid to do that. Over the last ten years, that’s exactly what I’ve been doing, and it’s been really successful. And it’s actually more enjoyable for me to go to Portland, do a reading, hear someone else read, hear a band. It’s more of a night, more of an occasion, versus me just like, showing up. So there were all these really important things that I was learning about what it means to be an artist that I thought was just part of being in a band, and that was really helpful.
And a step removed from that – having grown up in the 70s and 80s and playing in bands – not seriously, but in a committed way – in the 90s, I learned the reliance of independence, because a lot of the bands that I admired were bands on small labels, like Dischord or Touch-and-Go, and those were basically labels run out of someone’s house. They didn't have money, but they had this great reputation and dignity. If Ian MacKaye came out with a record by some band, I’d go buy it, just because I trusted him as a label-owner. That idea of DIY, not buying into this corporization of art, that had a huge impact on my writing as well, because I feel like the freedom to make books that I’m interested in reading, not so concerned with whether this is gonna be a big hit… The books that I write are kinda influenced by that same spirit. As an indie musician, your goal isn't to get on the radio or sell a billion copies; it’s to make a real interesting record. That same spirit is a huge part of what I do. A couple weeks ago, I did this reading at the Metro as part of Story Week, and I've read there a couple times before, but it was really momentous for me, because I grew up going to shows there. I've done readings now at a lot of these music venues that I had once played at in bands, so in some ways it’s like I never really stopped. In a lot of ways, I'm still engaged in that world. Literature isn't just for people who go to college, or go to bookstores. Through my experiences, I've learned that it’s bigger and there’s these interesting connections between music and literature, literature and art… things that musicians sometimes take for granted. And I feel really grateful for that.
If you can't tell, I'm rather sick of introductions. Read the damn post.
Me: So, besides the ages, what did you feel really changed about the scene in Chicago from when you started playing to when you stopped?
Joe: In the mid-90s in Chicago, there was this emphasis more on art rock or math rock or post-rock bands, like The Sea and Cake, Tortoise, Don Caballero, bands that were pretty instrument-based, almost jazz-influenced. The idea of being "rock", like a rock band, whether that was garage rock or indie rock – for a couple years, that fell away. So at a lot of venues, there was like - I don’t wanna say prog-rock or whatever, but these people were awesome at their instruments - there were no lyrics, mostly instrumental music, bands that had more of an abstract sound… and that was real interesting for a while. And then in the late 90s, there was this revival or resurgence of garage rock that really took off. There was this great explosion of bands like Baseball Furies, and Brian [Costello’s] band the Functional Blackouts, and a couple bands that I played in. Then this real interesting scene started developing - and I think I still see them online - this magazine Horizontal Action, and there were all these different garage-rock-oriented festivals. Suddenly, there was the return of, “Okay, it’s cool again to be in a rock band, and have songs with lyrics, and to honor the music you had grown up listening to," like The Who, or The Rolling Stones, or The Beatles. And then in the late 90s, early 2000s, there was a kind of similar resurgence on a national level, bands like The Hives, and The Strokes, and The White Stripes, bands that were getting national attention that were returning to a more familiar rock-song structure and sound, and it echoed what was already going on here. It was wonderful, because that’s the music I always loved, you know? I like rock music. Not to say I’m not a huge jazz fan – it’s just a different kind of experience.
Me: It’s more familiar.
Joe: It is, and I mean, Chicago has one of the greatest avant-garde jazz scenes in the world, and we have these great people, like Ken Vandermark, and a number of other amazing soloists and avant-garde players, but going to see a jazz show, it’s kinda this thing up here [hovers his hands around his cranium] and it feels like you listen with your head, and not with your chest and your balls – like when you see a great rock show and your whole body’s involved.
Me: I’ve always heard the word “cerebral” to describe certain bands like that.
Joe: And it is! And it’s also clear that Vandermark grew up listening to Black Sabbath, and it feels like “Oh shit, this is as intense.” It still has those rock elements, even though it is avant-garde jazz.
Places like the Empty Bottle and Lounge Acts hosted these different nights to promote these different kinds of sound. And they still do! Well, the Hideout kinda took over when Lounge Acts closed. And then there was the “return to rock” thing. Somewhere in there too, there was this blossoming indie rock scene, which was a little more reserved or restrained. Bands that were echoing the Pixies, or Pavement, or the Smiths. There were bands like the Scotland Yard Gospel Choir and… I’m trying to think of who else fits that bill, that incorporated stuff from folk and rock, that had maybe a less direct garage-rock/punk sound, but still didn’t feel like mainstream rock. You could go see a show, and there was this loud punk-kinda garage band, here’s this band that feels more indie rock, here’s this other band that has some weird instrumentation. Venues like that showed the breath of all the different music that was being produced at that time. You feel really luck to be able to go see a show that has that many different kinds of music being played.
Me: When you were first starting out, back in the early 90s, what bands that you’d seen or played with did you look up to? Like, who made you want to play music?
Joe: There are a few bands here in Chicago, they were bands I felt were so tremendous that I didn’t associate them with Chicago, like “Oh man, I didn’t even know they were from here”, bands like the Jesus Lizard-
Me: Oh shit.
Joe: Well there you go! I saw a couple shows at the Metro, and they were just completely electrifying… They were bands like that, that made you think “This is why I live in Chicago, because people like that are making music.” You almost felt this weird sense of ownership. Bands like that, and the Mids – I think they broke up by ’95 or ’96. That was one of the big bands. And there were bands like Shellac, Steve Albini’s band, who’d put out these really formidable, really interesting records. Jay Ryan’s band, Dianogah, which was another more instrumental, but really really interesting band that starting putting on shows in the mid-90s, and I think every so often they continue to play. That was more noise rock or aggressive rock stuff. And then there were bands like Andrew Bird, who was doing this quasi-jazz rock folk stuff that had interesting instrumentation – like instead of there being a lead guitar set up, there’d be someone playing a violin. To this day, Andrew Bird is widely recognized, still lives in town. Then there's like, Jeff Tweedy of Wilco. Bands like that in the mid-90s that you felt were almost ambassadors. And that’s not even to mention by the mid-90s/late-90s, Chicago hip-hop started to take off, performers like Kanye West and Lupe Fiasco. Those guys suddenly put Chicago on the map in a huge way, so you felt like you’re part of this city that’s on the forefront of some really interesting music.
Me: I guess we’ll move on to the final question: the hackneyed interview question. If you had to tell your younger musician self something, what would it be?
Joe: I don’t know if I’ve ever heard that question. I don’t think it’s hackneyed at all!
Well, it’s like I said earlier, that playing in bands… There’s just all these interesting implications I wouldn't have been aware of at the time, like helping you understand your relationship to an audience, your idea of promotion, and marketing, and touring. Even when I’m writing a short story, I don’t feel like it’s done until I can read it to an audience, and that’s one of the ways I figure out if it’s working or not; you read it and you’re like “Ooh… This part… that didn't work,” or “This part, people laughed.”
When you’re in a band, you’re constantly doing stuff. You’re writing songs, you record a record, you have to make flyers, you have to rent a van or save up and buy one, maybe you play a bunch of shows, and you’re constantly having to convince your friends and strangers to come to your shows and promote yourself in a fairly aggressive way, right? If you book a show at a venue and no one shows up, they’re not gonna have you back. So this pursuit of making stuff and getting in the habit of finding a way to get it out in the world, whether it’s making a record or making a flyer, getting posters made, booking shows, that habit that I did over and over and over again in my twenties, it really helped me as a writer, cuz I still do that stuff, I still am having constantly to promote work.
I had two books come out with these big corporate presses, my first two novels, and they had a certain way of promoting their books, which meant they just kinda sent them out to reviewers and hoped people reviewed them – and I had grown up playing in all these bands, and I was like “Why not go on tour? I could do it for cheap, I could sleep on strangers’ floors – I’ll sell books out of the car.” and they’d never had someone do that. This was what I’d been doing. Third book came out. I worked with a publisher that was really interested in that idea, and the book was a huge success because I was able to get out and tour, basically adapt what I’d been doing, what I knew already worked. If I do a reading in Portland, I need to get like, two people from Portland on the bill, cuz if I show up and I only know ten people in Portland, there’s only gonna be ten people in the bookstore. But if I invite another writer, or some musician, then we’ll have forty people. That was a totally foreign concept to a lot of these publicists, and they were actually afraid to do that. Over the last ten years, that’s exactly what I’ve been doing, and it’s been really successful. And it’s actually more enjoyable for me to go to Portland, do a reading, hear someone else read, hear a band. It’s more of a night, more of an occasion, versus me just like, showing up. So there were all these really important things that I was learning about what it means to be an artist that I thought was just part of being in a band, and that was really helpful.
And a step removed from that – having grown up in the 70s and 80s and playing in bands – not seriously, but in a committed way – in the 90s, I learned the reliance of independence, because a lot of the bands that I admired were bands on small labels, like Dischord or Touch-and-Go, and those were basically labels run out of someone’s house. They didn't have money, but they had this great reputation and dignity. If Ian MacKaye came out with a record by some band, I’d go buy it, just because I trusted him as a label-owner. That idea of DIY, not buying into this corporization of art, that had a huge impact on my writing as well, because I feel like the freedom to make books that I’m interested in reading, not so concerned with whether this is gonna be a big hit… The books that I write are kinda influenced by that same spirit. As an indie musician, your goal isn't to get on the radio or sell a billion copies; it’s to make a real interesting record. That same spirit is a huge part of what I do. A couple weeks ago, I did this reading at the Metro as part of Story Week, and I've read there a couple times before, but it was really momentous for me, because I grew up going to shows there. I've done readings now at a lot of these music venues that I had once played at in bands, so in some ways it’s like I never really stopped. In a lot of ways, I'm still engaged in that world. Literature isn't just for people who go to college, or go to bookstores. Through my experiences, I've learned that it’s bigger and there’s these interesting connections between music and literature, literature and art… things that musicians sometimes take for granted. And I feel really grateful for that.
Labels:
andrew bird,
chicago,
columbia college chicago,
don caballero,
fiction,
functional blackouts,
ian mackaye,
interview,
joe meno,
kanye west,
ken vandermark,
music,
shellac,
the sea and cake,
the strokes,
tortoise,
white stripes,
wilco
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)